From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched/deadline: reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:48:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5523E01C.9020808@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428310399-13489-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 06/04/2015 09:53, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> This patch adds check that prevents futile attempts to move dl tasks to
> a CPU with active tasks of equal or earlier deadline. The same behavior as
> commit 80e3d87b2c55 ("sched/rt: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating
> locking of non-feasible target") for rt class.
>
This commit introduced also this kind of check in find_lock_lowest_rq().
Don't we need something like this in find_lock_later_rq() as well?
Thanks,
- Juri
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 3bd3158..b8b9355 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
> (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
> int target = find_later_rq(p);
>
> - if (target != -1)
> + if (target != -1 &&
> + dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
> + cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr))
> cpu = target;
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 8:53 [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/deadline: make init_sched_dl_class() __init Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 23:00 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/deadline: reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2015-04-07 22:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 10:27 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-20 22:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 23:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21 8:22 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/deadline: drop duplicate init_sched_dl_class declaration Wanpeng Li
2015-04-08 8:47 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-08 8:33 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/deadline: depend on clearing throttled status in replenish_dl_entity Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21 8:16 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-21 8:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/rt: reschedule if stop/dl task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-14 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-27 9:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-06 7:11 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5523E01C.9020808@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).