From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, aperture: Check for GART before accessing GART registers
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:46:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5523EDC2.5080206@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150407123457.GA3681@pd.tnic>
On 4/7/2015 7:34 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 06:10:22PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>>> So what happens if !early_pci_allowed() but the GART is present? We'll
>>> set amd_northbridges.flags |= AMD_NB_GART, but won't run any of the
>>> setup code in aperture_64.c, right? Is that a valid setup?
>> It might be a valid setup. But it would work correctly only if BIOS did the
>> right thing with setting up aperture space.
>>
>> If !early_pci_allowed() and BIOS did not setup aperture correctly, that
>> would have caused problems already.
>> But it has not been an issue so far right?
> I think the right question to ask is:
>
> What are we doing when there's no GART?
>
> So what you probably want to do is:
>
> if (!amd_gart_present())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> *before* the compound check.
>
> Now, if we have detected a GART, i.e., amd_gart_present() is TRUE, the
> code will behave as it used to behave before.
>
> This should be the least intrusive change going forward IMHO.
>
Okay. I'll do that and correct the typos Ingo pointed out earlier and
resend.
Thanks,
-Aravind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-01 14:32 [PATCH] x86, aperture: Check for GART before accessing GART registers Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-02 6:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-02 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 15:54 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-02 16:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 16:23 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-02 16:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-02 17:04 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-02 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-02 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-06 23:10 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-07 12:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-07 14:46 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-04-07 14:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-07 20:34 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-08 7:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-14 11:15 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2015-04-14 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-14 18:22 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2015-04-14 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-04 11:11 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5523EDC2.5080206@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox