From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [4.0-rc+] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:863 dma_async_device_register+0xe0/0x540()
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:31:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552654F1.6020300@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409070927.GI26727@lukather>
On 04/09/2015 03:09 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 04/08/2015 11:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>> On 03/05/2015 11:12 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:04:21AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>>>>> First boot of 4.0-rc+ gave me [1] on a Beaglebone Black due to
>>>>>>>
>>>>> The warning is intentional to get driver fixed and give the right behaviour
>>>>>
>>>>> Felipe had sent a patch for this but that one needs an update
>>>>
>>>> Vinod,
>>>>
>>>> Felipe's patch never made it to mainline, and this warning is
>>>> still happening on 4.0-rc7 so please revert for 4.0-final.
>>>
>>> That patch isn't introducing any regression. I fail to see how that
>>> justifies a revert so late in the release cycle.
>>
>> Arguably it never should have been introduced in the first place
>
> Upon which arguments? So far, I've seen none but "my boot logs look
> bad now".
1. Every subsystem has drivers that don't fully conform to a desired
interface. If even a small fraction did this, everyone's logs would
be cluttered with this garbage. For that matter, if just the serial
subsystem alone did this, logs would be awash in warnings.
2. Now _every_ dmaengine driver "fix" for this will need to be pushed
to -stable.
>> and this was at least known since Mar 5 (and likely earlier);
>> arguing that it's late in the cycle is a bit disingenuous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 15:04 [4.0-rc+] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:863 dma_async_device_register+0xe0/0x540() Peter Hurley
2015-03-05 16:12 ` Vinod Koul
2015-04-08 15:53 ` Peter Hurley
2015-04-08 15:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-08 16:07 ` Peter Hurley
2015-04-08 16:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-04-08 16:23 ` Peter Hurley
2015-04-09 7:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-09 10:31 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2015-04-09 11:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-08 16:26 ` Peter Hurley
2015-04-09 7:07 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552654F1.6020300@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox