From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pty: Fix input race when closing
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:53:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5526BC8B.202@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOocsPXirCwRxW=eB3qbEGnoFfDGdqPLWppj1KEKAeoB6w@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/09/2015 01:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
>> A read() from a pty master may mistakenly indicate EOF (errno == -EIO)
>> after the pty slave has closed, even though input data remains to be read.
>> For example,
>>
>> pty slave | input worker | pty master
>> | |
>> | | n_tty_read()
>> pty_write() | | input avail? no
>> add data | | sleep
>> schedule worker --->| | .
>> |---> flush_to_ldisc() | .
>> pty_close() | fill read buffer | .
>> wait for worker | wakeup reader --->| .
>> | read buffer full? |---> input avail ? yes
>> |<--- yes - exit worker | copy 4096 bytes to user
>> TTY_OTHER_CLOSED <---| |<--- kick worker
>> | |
>>
>> **** New read() before worker starts ****
>>
>> | | n_tty_read()
>> | | input avail? no
>> | | TTY_OTHER_CLOSED? yes
>> | | return -EIO
>>
>> Several conditions are required to trigger this race:
>> 1. the ldisc read buffer must become full so the input worker exits
>> 2. the read() count parameter must be >= 4096 so the ldisc read buffer
>> is empty
>> 3. the subsequent read() occurs before the kicked worker has processed
>> more input
>>
>> However, the underlying cause of the race is that data is pipelined, while
>> tty state is not; ie., data already written by the pty slave end is not
>> yet visible to the pty master end, but state changes by the pty slave end
>> are visible to the pty master end immediately.
>>
>> Pipeline the TTY_OTHER_CLOSED state through input worker to the reader.
>> 1. Introduce TTY_OTHER_DONE which is set by the input worker when
>> TTY_OTHER_CLOSED is set and either the input buffers are flushed or
>> input processing has completed. Readers/polls are woken when
>> TTY_OTHER_DONE is set.
>> 2. Reader/poll checks TTY_OTHER_DONE instead of TTY_OTHER_CLOSED.
>> 3. A new input worker is started from pty_close() after setting
>> TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, which ensures the TTY_OTHER_DONE state will be
>> set if the last input worker is already finished (or just about to
>> exit).
>>
>> Remove tty_flush_to_ldisc(); no in-tree callers.
>>
>> Fixes: 52bce7f8d4fc ("pty, n_tty: Simplify input processing on final close")
>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429756
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19+
>> Reported-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
>> Reported-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/serial/tty.txt | 3 +++
>> drivers/tty/n_hdlc.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/tty/pty.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>> include/linux/tty.h | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I tried it on 3.19.3 and it doesn't work with the testcase in
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
Can you test this patch on top of mainline? There's a couple of
fixes in 4.0-rc that specifically address weakly-ordered CPUs.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 14:30 [PATCH 1/1] pty, n_tty: continue processing input until the tty_buffer chain is flushed Andy Whitcroft
2015-03-16 18:03 ` Peter Hurley
2015-03-16 18:24 ` Andy Whitcroft
2015-03-24 15:56 ` Peter Hurley
2015-04-09 14:54 ` [PATCH] pty: Fix input race when closing Peter Hurley
2015-04-09 17:43 ` H.J. Lu
2015-04-09 17:53 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2015-04-09 17:55 ` H.J. Lu
2015-04-09 22:11 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5526BC8B.202@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox