public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NULL deref around blkmq in v4.0-rc1–rc7
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:42:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5526F25B.5010501@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwwXLfz1mjiXGQtMZTDYEtspSPh64cokgYM9q7j9PKLwQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/09/2015 03:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure why it isn't all zeroed, definitely the saner thing to do at init
>> time.
>
> So practically speaking, it might well often be zeroed just because
> the BIOS may have initialized memory that way (and big multi-page
> allocations have probably not gotten re-used).
>
>> And if this is mpt, we recently ran into some list corruption issues due to
>> a bug in the driver. It hit on reboot, but it was scan related, so could be
>> a boot issue as well.
>
> So one of the earlier emails had this:
>
>     Copyright (c) 1999-2008 LSI Corporation
>     Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.20
>     mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
>     ioc0: LSISAS1068 A0: Capabilities={Initiator}
>     scsi host0: ioc0: LSISAS1068 A0, FwRev=00000000h, Ports=8, MaxQ=256, IRQ=22
>     mptsas: ioc0: attaching ssp device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 1, phy 1,
> sas_addr 0x1060504030201a0
>     scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     VBOX     HARDDISK         1.0  PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>     scsi 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
>     mptbase: ioc1: Initiating bringup
>     ioc1: LSISAS1068 A0: Capabilities={Initiator}
>     scsi host1: ioc1: LSISAS1068 A0, FwRev=00000000h, Ports=8, MaxQ=256, IRQ=17
>     mptsas: ioc1: attaching ssp device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 0, phy 0,
> sas_addr 0x60504030201a0
>     scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access     VBOX     HARDDISK         1.0  PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>     scsi 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
>
> and I'm assuming that that is the backing storage.

mpt is a maze of roughly duplicate, crazy drivers. The bug in question 
impacted mpt2sas and mpt3sas, and this looks like the mpt fusion driver. 
So it's probably not that.

> And yes, memory corruption sounds like a more likely cause than
> anything else. I don't like how the request data wasn't fully
> initialized, but the cmd->sense_buffer pointer itself *should* have
> been initialized by the ->init_request() call.

The block request state should be sane, we clear what we need, and 
at-alloc init will ensure that state is safe across request reuse. But 
it really should just be cleared unconditionally at allocation time.

And ->init_request() should take care of the SCSI command init. It does 
look like it's relying on zeroes already, so either adding the memset() 
or just adding the __GFP_ZERO would be prudent.

> So I don't actually expect my patch to really make any difference,
> although I do think that code should be looked at.

Jan, is it always clearing in a page size? That seems odd, especially if 
we're considering random gunk in memory.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08 13:41 NULL deref around xfs in v4.0-rc1–rc7 Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-08 15:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 17:38   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 18:24     ` NULL deref around blkmq " Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 21:12       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 21:25         ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-09 21:37           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 21:42             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-04-09 22:32               ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 22:29         ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-10  0:07           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-11 17:46             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-11 17:47               ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-11 19:48               ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5526F25B.5010501@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jengelh@inai.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox