From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NULL deref around blkmq in v4.0-rc1–rc7
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:42:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5526F25B.5010501@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwwXLfz1mjiXGQtMZTDYEtspSPh64cokgYM9q7j9PKLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/09/2015 03:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure why it isn't all zeroed, definitely the saner thing to do at init
>> time.
>
> So practically speaking, it might well often be zeroed just because
> the BIOS may have initialized memory that way (and big multi-page
> allocations have probably not gotten re-used).
>
>> And if this is mpt, we recently ran into some list corruption issues due to
>> a bug in the driver. It hit on reboot, but it was scan related, so could be
>> a boot issue as well.
>
> So one of the earlier emails had this:
>
> Copyright (c) 1999-2008 LSI Corporation
> Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.20
> mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
> ioc0: LSISAS1068 A0: Capabilities={Initiator}
> scsi host0: ioc0: LSISAS1068 A0, FwRev=00000000h, Ports=8, MaxQ=256, IRQ=22
> mptsas: ioc0: attaching ssp device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 1, phy 1,
> sas_addr 0x1060504030201a0
> scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access VBOX HARDDISK 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> scsi 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> mptbase: ioc1: Initiating bringup
> ioc1: LSISAS1068 A0: Capabilities={Initiator}
> scsi host1: ioc1: LSISAS1068 A0, FwRev=00000000h, Ports=8, MaxQ=256, IRQ=17
> mptsas: ioc1: attaching ssp device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 0, phy 0,
> sas_addr 0x60504030201a0
> scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access VBOX HARDDISK 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> scsi 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
>
> and I'm assuming that that is the backing storage.
mpt is a maze of roughly duplicate, crazy drivers. The bug in question
impacted mpt2sas and mpt3sas, and this looks like the mpt fusion driver.
So it's probably not that.
> And yes, memory corruption sounds like a more likely cause than
> anything else. I don't like how the request data wasn't fully
> initialized, but the cmd->sense_buffer pointer itself *should* have
> been initialized by the ->init_request() call.
The block request state should be sane, we clear what we need, and
at-alloc init will ensure that state is safe across request reuse. But
it really should just be cleared unconditionally at allocation time.
And ->init_request() should take care of the SCSI command init. It does
look like it's relying on zeroes already, so either adding the memset()
or just adding the __GFP_ZERO would be prudent.
> So I don't actually expect my patch to really make any difference,
> although I do think that code should be looked at.
Jan, is it always clearing in a page size? That seems odd, especially if
we're considering random gunk in memory.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 13:41 NULL deref around xfs in v4.0-rc1–rc7 Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-08 15:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 18:24 ` NULL deref around blkmq " Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 21:25 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-09 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-09 21:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-04-09 22:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 22:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-10 0:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-11 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-11 17:47 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-11 19:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5526F25B.5010501@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox