From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: mancha <mancha1@zoho.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
dborkman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:46:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5527E22C.9080909@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2115964.QxtQ6rHSkc@tauon>
On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
...
>> I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could
>> be different, but this seems not to be the case.
>>
>> I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a
>> problem? It seems kind of strange to me...
+1
> Do you really think this is a compiler issue?
If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would
certainly be a different behavior.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 9:53 [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets mancha
2015-03-18 10:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 10:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 10:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 11:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:02 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:14 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:19 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:20 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 15:09 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 16:02 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 17:14 ` mancha
2015-03-18 17:49 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 19:09 ` mancha
2015-03-18 23:53 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2015-03-18 17:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 17:56 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 17:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 12:58 ` mancha
2015-04-10 13:25 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:22 ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:33 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 20:09 ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:26 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:36 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:46 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-04-10 14:50 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 19:10 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 20:41 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5527E22C.9080909@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mancha1@zoho.com \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox