From: "Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jsimmons@infradead.org
Subject: Re: matroxfb console oops in 2.4.2x
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:54:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552FB6B07DA@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
On 24 Jun 03 at 10:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 20:45, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > This one is culprit. If you'll comment this message out, it will not
> > crash.
>
> As discussed, this is true but if anyone _else_ happens to call printk
> during the same period, it'll still crash.
>
> Matroxfb is registering a screen for which it's not yet willing to
> attempt output -- and taking out this printk only serves to fix the
> coincidence which makes it 100% reproducible -- the thing is still
> broken without that printk.
There is no way around - at least I do not know such. matroxfb cannot
initialize hardware before call to the set_var, as otherwise you'll
get white 80x25 square instead of vgacon text copied to the matroxfb.
If you'll replace matroxfb_set_var(..., -2, &ACCESS_FBINFO(fbcon))
with matroxfb_set_var(..., -1, &ACCESS_FBINFO(fbcon)) in matroxfb_base.c,
you'll get behavior you are asking for: hardware gets initialized before
call to register_framebuffer(). Unfortunately it breaks
take_over_console for all vgacon users - and as there is more vgacon
users than sh users, I prefer just creating dummy putc/putcs functions
which will do nothing, over changing initialization order.
I'm still trying to find why PLL does not lock on your hardware,
but I still do not understand why it works on ia32 for secondary adapters,
but not on sh.
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-24 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-24 11:54 Petr Vandrovec [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-19 19:45 matroxfb console oops in 2.4.2x Petr Vandrovec
2003-06-19 21:58 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-20 10:52 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-24 9:09 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-19 12:21 Petr Vandrovec
2003-06-19 13:47 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-19 10:06 David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552FB6B07DA@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox