From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:22:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553608B5.8030404@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150420230234.GA7865@kernel>
On 21/04/15 00:02, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:59:02AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Hi Juri,
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:27:22AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 06/04/2015 09:53, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> pull_dl_task can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock, this means a stop task
>>>> can slip in, in which case we need to reschedule. This patch add the
>>>> reschedule when the scenario occurs.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I guess it can happen. Doesn't RT have the same problem? It seems that
>>> it also has to deal with DL tasks slipping in, right?
>>
>> Yeah, I will send another patch to handle RT class in the v2 patchset. :)
>
> Oh, I just find I have already done them in patch 7/7.
>
Oh, right! That one ended up in another bucket. Sorry about that.
Best,
- Juri
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Wanpeng Li
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Juri
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>> index b8b9355..844da0f 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>> @@ -1739,7 +1739,13 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>>> if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> - if (pull_dl_task(rq))
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * pull_dl_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this
>>>> + * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to
>>>> + * reschedule.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (pull_dl_task(rq) ||
>>>> + (rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)))
>>>> resched_curr(rq);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1786,6 +1792,14 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>>>> pull_dl_task(rq);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> + * pull_dl_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this
>>>> + * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to
>>>> + * reschedule.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop))
>>>> + resched_curr(rq);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
>>>> * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
>>>> * runqueue.
>>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 8:53 [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/deadline: make init_sched_dl_class() __init Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 23:00 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/deadline: reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 22:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 10:27 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-20 22:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 23:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21 8:22 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/deadline: drop duplicate init_sched_dl_class declaration Wanpeng Li
2015-04-08 8:47 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-08 8:33 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/deadline: depend on clearing throttled status in replenish_dl_entity Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21 8:16 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-21 8:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06 8:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/rt: reschedule if stop/dl task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-14 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-27 9:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-06 7:11 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553608B5.8030404@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).