From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Glenn Williamson <glenn.p.williamson@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:45:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5537EC31.7080808@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429678319-61356-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On 04/21/2015 09:51 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> + /*
> + * Copy rest of xstates in compact format to user.
> + */
> + for (i = 2; i < xstate_features; i++) {
> + if (test_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&pcntxt_mask)) {
> + int user_offset, kernel_offset;
> + int size;
> +
> + user_offset = xstate_offsets[i];
> + kernel_offset = xstate_comp_offsets[i];
> + size = xstate_sizes[i];
> +
> + if (__copy_to_user(buf_fx + user_offset,
> + xsave + kernel_offset, size))
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
Is this checking the right bitmap?
The 'xsaves' documentation says: "If RFBM[i] = 1, XSTATE_BV[i] is set to
the value of XINUSE[i]". Where "XINUSE denotes the state-component
bitmap corresponding to the init optimization".
So shouldn't this be checking xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv instead of
pcntxt_mask? The will be equal unless the "init optimization" is in play.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-22 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 4:51 [PATCH Bugfix v2 0/4] x86/xsave/xsaves: Fix a few xsave/xsaves related bugs Fenghua Yu
2015-04-22 4:51 ` [PATCH Bugfix v2 1/4] x86/xsave.c: Fix xstate offsets and sizes enumeration Fenghua Yu
2015-04-22 4:51 ` [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context Fenghua Yu
2015-04-22 18:45 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-04-22 19:05 ` Yu, Fenghua
2015-04-22 19:34 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-23 0:06 ` Yu, Fenghua
2015-04-23 0:21 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-23 0:23 ` Yu, Fenghua
2015-04-23 0:34 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-23 17:09 ` Yu, Fenghua
2015-04-23 21:32 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-28 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-28 22:09 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-28 22:11 ` Yu, Fenghua
2015-04-29 13:53 ` Dave Hansen
2015-04-22 4:51 ` [PATCH Bugfix v2 3/4] x86/xsaves: Rename xstate_size to kernel_xstate_size to explicitly distinguish xstate size in kernel from user space Fenghua Yu
2015-04-22 4:51 ` [PATCH Bugfix v2 4/4] x86/xsave: Don't add new states in xsave_struct Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5537EC31.7080808@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=glenn.p.williamson@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox