From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Don't return error on nested bitmap memory allocation failure
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5540D735.5030103@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jpgpp6nnlez.fsf@redhat.com>
Am 2015-04-29 um 14:55 schrieb Bandan Das:
> Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> writes:
>
>> Am 2015-04-28 um 21:55 schrieb Bandan Das:
>>>
>>> If get_free_page() fails for nested bitmap area, it's evident that
>>> we are gonna get screwed anyway but returning failure because we failed
>>> allocating memory for a nested structure seems like an unnecessary big
>>> hammer. Also, save the call for later; after we are done with other
>>> non-nested allocations.
>>
>> Frankly, I prefer failures over automatic degradations. And, as you
>> noted, the whole system will probably explode anyway if allocation of a
>> single page already fails. So what does this buy us?
>
> Yeah... I hear you. Ok, let me put it this way - Assume that we can
> defer this allocation up until the point that the nested subsystem is
> actually used i.e L1 tries running a guest and we try to allocate this
> area. If get_free_page() failed in that case, would we still want to
> kill L1 too ? I guess no.
We could block the hypervisor thread on the allocation, just like it
would block on faults for swapped out pages or new ones that have to be
reclaimed from the page cache first.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 19:55 [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Don't return error on nested bitmap memory allocation failure Bandan Das
2015-04-29 7:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-29 12:55 ` Bandan Das
2015-04-29 13:05 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2015-04-29 13:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-29 16:08 ` Bandan Das
2015-04-29 16:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-29 7:27 ` Nadav Amit
2015-04-29 8:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5540D735.5030103@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=fanwenyi0529@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox