Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-04-14T19:32:42Z

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:24:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > You might not like the design, but it is a valid design. Again, we
> > don't refuse to support hardware that is designed badly.
>
> Yeah except the small difference that unlike this, we can't change
> hardware.

And we can't change the design/implementation of many things, again,
it's not the kernel's job to prevent something, just because we don't
like the RFC, from being accepted.

Go read Havoc's email about why the design is the way it is that I just
posted. Maybe we are the ones that really don't know the issues
involved enough to say that the current design is somehow "wrong".

thanks,

greg k-h