From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754061AbbEAOyh (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 10:54:37 -0400 Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130]:22334 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753824AbbEAOyc (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 10:54:32 -0400 X-ME-Helo: [127.0.0.1] X-ME-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:54:30 +0200 X-ME-IP: 92.140.221.183 Message-ID: <554393A4.204@wanadoo.fr> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:54:28 +0200 From: Marion & Christophe JAILLET User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: x-gene: Remove a useless memset References: <1430483346-10583-1-git-send-email-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <20150501141922.GE14154@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20150501141922.GE14154@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150501-0, 01/05/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, yes, you are correct, it's a mistake. Should I resubmit with an updated subject? CJ Le 01/05/2015 16:19, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > The "[PATCH 2/2]" bit is a mistake. It's not part of a patchset. It's > just that you have sent two patches today. The first patch wasn't even > named [1/2]... > > Unless, it is part of a patchset?? If so where is the first patch? > > regards, > dan carpenter > >