From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
<yinghai@kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
<JBeulich@suse.com>, <slaoub@gmail.com>, <luto@amacapital.net>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
<prarit@redhat.com>, <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
<jroedel@suse.de>, <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<macro@linux-mips.org>, <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce/amd: Introduce deferred error interrupt handler
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 12:08:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5547A780.8080800@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504154652.GF3829@pd.tnic>
On 5/4/2015 10:46 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>>> What's the family check for? for BIOSes which don't set the LVT offset
>>> to 2, as they should?
>>>
>>> If so, we probably should say
>>>
>>> pr_err(FW_BUG "Your BIOS is not setting up LVT offset 0x2 for deferred error IRQs correctly.\n");
>>>
>>> or similar...
>> Yeah. I meant to provide a comment at least for this.
>> Forgot to do that.
>>
>> I'll print out a error message as you suggested (considering we do this in
>> other places like threshold setup or IBS setup..)
> lvt_off_valid() does that already. Adding Robert.
Not sure if lvt_off_valid() can be reused for deferred error interrupt
setup.
It expects some some of info to be in struct threshold_block which is
fine for threshold errors and the shifts for offset are different too.
For deferred errors, the workaround is a little different as it applies
to only the given family/model right now.
If the workaround needs to be applied for future processors, we can
extend the family check for those right?
>> Right. I think a __log_error() is a good idea.
>> Except, in amd_threshold_interrupt(), we have-
>> m.misc = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
>>
>> which, is actually useless as we don't use m.misc anywhere in
>> amd_decode_mce() or anywhere else in the decoding pipeline AFAICT.
>> We only print out if 'misc' is valid and we only need status bits for that-
>> ((m->status & MCI_STATUS_MISCV) ? "MiscV" : "-"),
>>
>> But, more importantly, we don't setup 'm.addr' here (in
>> amd_threshold_interrupt() or in amd_deferred_error_interrupt())
>> Which means anytime we pass an error to be decoded from the interrupt
>> handlers, we don't get any info about the error address.
> So what are we reporting with a deferred error if it is not a
> full-fledged MCE? We better fix that otherwise we probably shouldn't
> even report those. I mean, userspace is supposed to do some error
> handling based on error info but if that info's missing, we might just
> as well panic right then and there, right?
Oh no.. It is a proper MCE.
I was simply saying that when we look at dmesg logs after an error
happens, we would not see any useful info regarding the error address.
Here's an example-
[ 1314.651485] [Hardware Error]: Deferred error.
[ 1314.651611] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (15:60:0)
MC4_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|Deferred|-|UECC]: 0xdc04b00005080813
[ 1314.651898] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error Address: 0x0000000000000000
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The Error Address will always be logged as 0x0 as m->addr in
amd_decode_mce() is 0x0.
If we setup 'm.addr' in amd_threshold_interrupt() and
amd_deferred_error_interrupt() properly, then amd_decode_mce() would
actually have
some value in m->addr to report.
I didn't mean to say HW doesn't provide us the information in the addr
and/or the misc registers.
>> So, we can do one of these-
>> 1. Remove m.misc setup in amd_threshold_interrupt() and
>> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_ADDR(bank), m.addr) before we call mce_log()
>> 2. Since we have mce_read_aux() that reads misc and addr registers, we can
>> move the mce_[rd|wr]msrl wrappers and mce_read_aux() into mce.h and use it
>> here in mce_amd.c
>>
>> Thoughts?
> Makes sense but you need to first check though, which registers are
> valid in the hw when a threshold/deferred error happens and collect
> them. Only then we can do proper recovery.
>
>
The addr, misc registers are still valid for threshold, deferred errors.
(Of course, misc is valid only if m->status & MCI_STATUS_MISCV)
My point was, in __log_error(), we can read relevant status and addr
MSRs to be passed to mce_log() as those are the only pieces of
information we use in the decoding chain; and discard the m.misc
assignment we do for threshold errors.
If userspace tools absolutely need 'misc' info too, we can go with
option (2) as mentioned above..
Thanks,
-Aravind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 14:49 [PATCH 0/4] Enable deferred error interrupts Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/mce: Define 'SUCCOR' cpuid bit Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-01 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-01 14:54 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-03 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-01 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-01 16:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce/amd: Introduce deferred error interrupt handler Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-30 20:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-01 4:16 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-01 9:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-01 14:50 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-03 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-04 15:29 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-04 15:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-04 17:08 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-05-04 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-04 19:06 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-04 19:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-05 18:39 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-05 20:28 ` Luck, Tony
2015-05-05 20:33 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, irq: Cleanup ordering of vector numbers Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-04-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce/amd: Rename setup_APIC_mce Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-05-01 7:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] Enable deferred error interrupts Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 14:50 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5547A780.8080800@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).