public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid()
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 12:15:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5548A641.6050407@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430793998-21631-4-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>



On 05/05/15 03:46, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> In ACPI processor drivers, we use direct comparisons of cpu logical
> id with -1 which are error prone in case logical cpuid is accidentally
> assinged an error code and prevents us from returning an error-encoding
> cpuid directly in some cases.
>
> So introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
> logical cpu num, then it will be used to replace the direct comparisons
> with -1.
>

Ah, OK I see that this fixes the issue I raised in PATCH 1/7, so I think
you need to reorder this and 1/7 patch IMO.

Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05  2:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI / processor: remove cpu_index in acpi_processor_get_info() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:08   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ACPI / processor: remove phys_id " Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:15   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-05-05 12:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-05 13:15       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 12:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-05 13:15     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 15:12   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] Xen / ACPI / processor: use invalid_logical_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] Xen / ACPI / processor: Remove unneeded NULL check in xen_acpi_processor_enable() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 10:29   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-05-09 22:06     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ACPI / processor: return specific error instead of -1 Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:25   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-05 13:14     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-11 16:35       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13  6:39         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-06  4:11     ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5548A641.6050407@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox