From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid()
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 21:15:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5548C254.7060409@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1905565.04MrkTmlaM@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2015年05月05日 20:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:46:34 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> In ACPI processor drivers, we use direct comparisons of cpu logical
>> id with -1 which are error prone in case logical cpuid is accidentally
>> assinged an error code and prevents us from returning an error-encoding
>> cpuid directly in some cases.
>>
>> So introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
>> logical cpu num, then it will be used to replace the direct comparisons
>> with -1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 5 +----
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> index 95492d0..62c846b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>> * Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no CPU
>> * entry in MADT
>> */
>> - if ((pr->id == -1) && (num_online_cpus() == 1))
>> + if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) && (num_online_cpus() == 1))
>> pr->id = 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>> * less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
>> * they are physically not present.
>> */
>> - if (pr->id == -1) {
>> + if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id)) {
>> int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>> index e5dd808..6dd98d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>> @@ -52,10 +52,7 @@ static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
>> type = (acpi_type == ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) ? 1 : 0;
>> cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(handle, type, acpi_id);
>>
>> - if (cpuid == -1)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - return true;
>> + return invalid_logical_cpuid(cpuid) ? false : true;
>
> What about
>
> return !invalid_logical_cpuid(cpuid);
yes, cleaner, will update my patch.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-05 2:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI / processor: remove cpu_index in acpi_processor_get_info() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ACPI / processor: remove phys_id " Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-05 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-05 13:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-05 13:15 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-05-05 15:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] Xen / ACPI / processor: use invalid_logical_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] Xen / ACPI / processor: Remove unneeded NULL check in xen_acpi_processor_enable() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 10:29 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-05-09 22:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ACPI / processor: return specific error instead of -1 Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05 11:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-05 13:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-11 16:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 6:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-06 4:11 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5548C254.7060409@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox