From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752477AbbEFMKr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 May 2015 08:10:47 -0400
Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:6734 "EHLO
	hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752436AbbEFMKo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 May 2015 08:10:44 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Wed, 06 May 2015 05:08:47 -0700
Message-ID: <554A0478.6070007@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 17:39:28 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: max8973: get rid of extra variable for
 gpio validity
References: <1429534457-15515-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1429534457-15515-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20150420211939.GQ14892@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150420211939.GQ14892@sirena.org.uk>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.25.59.19) To
 bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Tuesday 21 April 2015 02:49 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 06:24:15PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> To find that dvs-gpio is valid or not, gpio API gpio_is_valid()
>> can be directly used instead of intermediate variable.
> Applied, thanks.
>

This patch is not available on linux-next. Is it pending for any clean-up?