From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
To: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests: fixes for installation and cross compilation
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 09:23:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554A31F4.7080200@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMBJr53a0cdJ5yjBu3ADv=x-==X0HXVQDELmuSuLLNCKLzviw@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/06/2015 08:49 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
>
> On 21 April 2015 at 15:49, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch set fixes various issues observed when cross building and
>> installing selftests.
>>
>> As I began investigating improving the test output format, I performed an
>> audit of the current tests to ensure all tests were able to execute on various
>> target architectures. I found that some tests did not install their binaries
>> and others required directories to be installed to execute properly. There
>> were also cases in which tests were being installed when they were never built.
>> With this series applied all tests compile when appropriate and install their
>> output properly.
>>
>> I have tested this series by building, installing and deploying all selftests
>> to x86, arm and arm64 targets.
>>
>> Changes v3 -> v4:
>> * Planning to send a followup series to address the lib.mk issue so I've
>> dropped the breakpoints and x86 installation workaround.
>> * x86: Removed redundant else logic block.
>> * Applied Andy Lutomirski's ACK to patches 4 and 5.
>> * Rebased onto next-20150421.
>
> I believe all comments have been addressed, is there anything else you
> would like to see?
>
>>
>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>> * 5/8: Removed duplicate all_32.
>> * 6/8: Ensure the default rule is all in every case.
>> * 6/8: Fixed commit message wording for better clarity.
>> * Applied Michael Ellerman's ACK to patches 1-4, and 8 as they have not changed.
>> * Rebased onto next-20150420.
>>
>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>> * Have no dependency on all when CROSS_COMPILE is set. (Andy Lutomirski)
>> * Added Andy on CC for all x86 test patches.
>> * Split up the x86 patches for better clarity.
>> * Rebased onto next-20150415.
>>
>> This series is based on next-20150421.
>>
>> Tyler Baker (7):
>> selftests: copy TEST_DIRS to INSTALL_PATH
>> selftests/ftrace: install test.d
>> selftests/kdbus: install kdbus-test
>> selftest/x86: build both bitnesses
>> selftest/x86: have no dependency on all when cross building
>> selftests/x86: install tests
>> selftests/exec: do not install subdir as it is already created
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile | 2 +-
>> tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile | 1 +
>> tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/Makefile | 2 ++
>> tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 3 +++
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++---
>> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
Patches are good. I will be applying these to linux-kselftest
next in a day or two for 4.2
Thanks for fixing these issues.
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 22:49 [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests: fixes for installation and cross compilation Tyler Baker
2015-05-06 14:49 ` Tyler Baker
2015-05-06 15:23 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2015-05-06 15:37 ` Tyler Baker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554A31F4.7080200@osg.samsung.com \
--to=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tyler.baker@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox