From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752055AbbEHEFv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 8 May 2015 00:05:51 -0400
Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:48358 "EHLO
	mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751260AbbEHEFt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 May 2015 00:05:49 -0400
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-07-554c361af9cf
Message-id: <554C3617.10906@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:43 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to
 mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
References: <1431020935-5025-1-git-send-email-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
 <CAJKOXPcCc8j=i5FPdF62bGKar74+4U=C9BPN9ar2j52Y8dSMwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANAwSgT8aa5svHgLbkNkSPXWT_hLez8e4cBws2ajEB9p56WHFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CANAwSgT8aa5svHgLbkNkSPXWT_hLez8e4cBws2ajEB9p56WHFA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7pSZj6hBit3cVhsnLGe1eL1C0OL
	/sevmS02Pb7GavGx5x6rxeVdc9gsZpzfx2SxbuMtdounEy6yWRx+085q8eNMN4vFql1/GB14
	PC739TJ57Jx1l91j06pONo871/aweWxeUu/Rt2UVo8fnTXIB7FFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGb2z
	57MU7GOuuNIQ1cD4hKmLkZNDQsBE4nB/MyOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaWMEj+On2eCcJ4ySqxo
	+QjWwSugIXGl+QcbiM0ioCrRMXM5O4jNJmAssXn5EqA4B4eoQIRE94lKiHJBiR+T77GA2CIC
	ahJXnq5gBZnJLLCKWWLmmeOsIAlhgVyJrkPdrBDLLjFKvFyzgBkkwSkQLLHn3FcWkKHMAnoS
	9y9qgYSZBeQlNq95yzyBUWAWkh2zEKpmIalawMi8ilE0tTS5oDgpPddQrzgxt7g0L10vOT93
	EyMkSr7sYFx8zOoQowAHoxIP7wo771Ah1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIrzmaj6hQrwpiZVVqUX58UWl
	OanFhxilOViUxHnn7nofIiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamBMPBRqnzhjVsEezpKjVt91Aria
	Jrd58MYe7H239k/ak/vfLrzYbL2oeYWP6IRnKaYfnk3Y5P/JeW761LyEi9qGzDkrj82Ri50X
	WnBcnvdk51sDcymLpX3HkveenDbNQkredt9fa/dVFV0szjPds1iYbGuPKE93ll+SnW894WLm
	y+wVWy9O9P6qxFKckWioxVxUnAgAHdtiO44CAAA=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08.05.2015 13:01, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krysztof,
> 
> Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
> I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
> cpufreq-exynos.

It does not have to be energy consumption. It may be something else
visible, like wrong values for clock rates. I don't know, it is your
patch so you should know *what is fixed* (or changed).

Best regards,
Krzysztof