From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753772AbbEKM6S (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 08:58:18 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:46247 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753598AbbEKM6K (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 08:58:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5550A760.9080200@free-electrons.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:58:08 +0200 From: Gregory CLEMENT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Hesselbarth CC: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gabriel Dobato , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 References: <1430770130-7833-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <554A11D5.9060407@free-electrons.com> <2740728.K6gusYnMDt@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <2740728.K6gusYnMDt@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sebastian, On 06/05/2015 15:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:06:29 Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> >> On 04/05/2015 22:08, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>> This is v2 of the patch set to improve current mainline support for >>> the Compulab CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab >>> SBC-A510 base board. >>> >>> Compared to v1 [1] there have been the overall changes: >>> - Drop i2c-mux-pinctrl rework as Wolfram Sang raised concerns with >>> respect to OF_DYNAMIC. Instead we add i2c-mux-pinctrl node by >>> default and wait until corresponding driver respects disabled >>> sub-bus nodes. This will add 3 additional i2c busses to all >>> Dove based boards, but no functional change with respect to >>> i2c-0. >>> - Split patches dealing with arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile to route >>> them though arm-soc directly. >>> >>> Other patches of v1 have already been taken by MVEBU SoC maintainers >>> as fixes. >>> >>> Patches are based on v4.1-rc1 and are intended for v4.2. All patches >>> contain appropriate Acked-by's from related maintainers. Patches 3 >>> and 5 should go thought arm-soc directly, the rest can go though >>> mvebu tree. >> >> Usually even the change of the arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile go to >> arm-soc through mvebu. For patch 5 it makes sens because if the series >> is spited then the Makefile could be merged before the new file >> to build. >> >> So unless, Arnd or Olof really want to pick the patches 3 and 5 I will >> apply the patches 2 to 5 on mvebu/dt. >> >> Arnd, Olof, do you agree? > > Yes, please pick up all the patches and send them to us with your > normal pull requests. patches 2 to 5 applied on mvebu/dt Thanks, Gregory > > Arnd > -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com