From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754251AbbEKOFs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:05:48 -0400 Received: from mail-bl2on0058.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.58]:48201 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752850AbbEKOFr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:05:47 -0400 Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.100) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; lip6.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; Message-ID: <5550B72D.2020004@xilinx.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:05:33 +0200 From: Michal Simek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julia Lawall , Michal Simek CC: , Michal Simek , =?windows-1252?Q?S=F6ren_Brinkmann?= , "Fabian Frederick" , , "David S. Miller" , =?windows-1252?Q?Manuel_Sch=F6lling?= , Markus Elfring , Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta , Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ll_temac: Use one return statement instead of two References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.5.0.1018-21536.005 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes;Yes;Yes X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.60.100;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(438002)(377454003)(199003)(51704005)(24454002)(164054003)(189002)(479174004)(5001960100002)(36756003)(2950100001)(189998001)(4001350100001)(36386004)(92566002)(77096005)(77156002)(5001770100001)(87936001)(62966003)(23746002)(33656002)(106466001)(46102003)(86362001)(6806004)(65806001)(19580395003)(80316001)(50466002)(63266004)(76176999)(50986999)(54356999)(19580405001)(65816999)(83506001)(87266999)(7059030)(107986001)(4001450100001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB018;H:xsj-pvapsmtpgw02;FPR:;SPF:Pass;MLV:sfv;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB018; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001);SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB018;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB018; X-Forefront-PRVS: 05739BA1B5 X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2015 14:05:44.9253 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.60.100];Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw02] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1AFFO11HUB018 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/07/2015 05:30 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 2015, Michal Simek wrote: > >> From: Michal Simek >> >> Use one return statement instead of two to simplify the code. >> Both are returning the same value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > > The from should be the same as the signed off. You need From if you want > something different than what is naturally put by your mailer. But that > doesn't see to be the case. ok. Fixed in v2. Thanks, Michal