From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964885AbbEMNpj (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:45:39 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:35167 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934239AbbEMNph (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:45:37 -0400 Message-ID: <5553557E.1080505@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 06:45:34 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Bolle CC: anees , Jonas Bonn , linux@lists.openrisc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] OpenRISC: Fix kernel build problem on OpenRISC References: <1431438321-4697-1-git-send-email-rean12is@gmail.com> <20150512200743.GA6155@roeck-us.net> <1431511102.2398.187.camel@x220> <55534FB4.1070709@roeck-us.net> <1431524020.2650.7.camel@x220> In-Reply-To: <1431524020.2650.7.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/13/2015 06:33 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11 instead. > > (That patch also suggests that "or12" in the patch we're discussing here > is a typo.) > > This is problem is present now for none months, apparently. Your patch The problem was already present when openrisc was introduced back in 2011; see arch/openrisc/TODO.openrisc. I just tried to get it fixed to let me use a more recent toolchain for my build tests. > was supposed to be applied already (see > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/22/36 ), but clearly nothing happened. > openrisc.net is for sale. > > What's going on here? > No idea :-( Guenter