From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751521AbeCTSvU (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:51:20 -0400 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:51552 "EHLO omr2.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751424AbeCTSvQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:51:16 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuJ2PGJF6iOtVRazgOyTW5lXZhfaVmoDX4P3hxB7s6evcBG/PurOQT5F9JfhjSgOtNqdO0/tA== From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu X-Google-Original-From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2017 with nmh-1.7+dev To: Liran Alon Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, idan.brown@ORACLE.COM, yuval.shaia@ORACLE.COM Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns In-Reply-To: <5AB13953.3000606@ORACLE.COM> References: <5AB12A0E.2060704@ORACLE.COM> <20180320.120036.1999626754164343704.davem@davemloft.net> <5AB132C5.5010806@ORACLE.COM> <20180320.123401.2138083793709750726.davem@davemloft.net> <5AB13953.3000606@ORACLE.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1521571867_3137P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:51:07 -0400 Message-ID: <55538.1521571867@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1521571867_3137P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:39:47 +0200, Liran Alon said: > What is your opinion in regards if it's OK to put the flag enabling this > "fix" in /proc/sys/net/core? Do you think it's sufficient? Umm.. *which* /proc/sys/net/core? These could differ for things that are in different namespaces. Or are you proposing one systemwide global value (which also gets "interesting" if it's writable inside a container and changes the behavior a different container sees...) --==_Exmh_1521571867_3137P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2017 iQEVAwUBWrFYG40DS38y7CIcAQJL5Af+JvWAyw/rPHQdMa+n+LZhoLmEtp7FNEsB +QXUcxO5XeuSecJbg0SpPPRh5KcWy2VNY3kjq4yjqFtSSrXmTR0atJ7Oi0DTyRlF r4H6NM1CtTNaqlS6khWKqesccLL7thUYNiP5ckD2pYCMu3iCdRbp+y0RFiNFa9vS yDWFz9cAThQM8tu3L9RW5PdKn44WDzOmf0WXrhvTEpU6HOQWBj8aZzUSLz14Q2Jy KSCjpVbD3sqZEqcmFt+N7UckpP4G360k1KNeekjqsVf3FeKgnrg8+SxQ+Cb914xL 38t8eX1Ot3dMwBUYqnUUB5rwVdu0jQM4zpWgIUgG9ylP20RUgiOFXQ== =dHhk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1521571867_3137P--