From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
riel@redhat.com, sbsiddha@gmail.com, luto@amacapital.net,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] x86, mpx: use new tsk_get_xsave_addr()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:01:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555A7D4D.5090403@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505182218220.4225@nanos>
On 05/18/2015 01:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
>> > siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> > - struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf);
>> > -int mpx_handle_bd_fault(struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf);
>> > + struct task_struct *tsk);
>> > +int mpx_handle_bd_fault(struct task_struct *tsk);
> So you still keep *tsk and remove it in the next patch. I guess either
> ordering has its value, so no problem to do it this way.
I agree that this looks a bit goofy.
Originally, this patch just passed around 'tsk' instead of 'xsave_buf'.
But I realized we could go a step further.
The way it stands, it is bisectable and been built in this configuration
for a month or two. I'd really like to keep it this way if possible,
even though it looks a bit goofy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 18:59 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 6) Dave Hansen
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86, mpx: use new tsk_get_xsave_addr() Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-19 0:01 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 19:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-18 19:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 05/19] x86, mpx: remove redundant MPX_BNDCFG_ADDR_MASK Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86, mpx: cleanup: do not pass task around when unnecessary Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 06/19] x86, mpx: we do not allocate the bounds directory Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86, mpx: boot-time disable Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 09/19] x86, mpx: trace entry to bounds exception paths Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-18 23:06 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 23:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 08/19] x86, mpx: trace #BR exceptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 10/19] x86, mpx: trace ranged MPX operations Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 12/19] x86: make is_64bit_mm() widely available Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 11/19] x86, mpx: trace allocation of new bounds tables Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 13/19] x86, mpx: Add temporary variable to reduce masking Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 14/19] x86, mpx: new directory entry to addr helper Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 15/19] x86, mpx: do 32-bit-only cmpxchg for 32-bit apps Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 16/19] x86, mpx: support 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernel Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-18 23:29 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 23:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 17/19] x86, mpx: rewrite unmap code Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 18/19] x86, mpx: do not count MPX VMAs as neighbors when unmapping Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 19/19] x86, mpx: allow mixed binaries again Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555A7D4D.5090403@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox