From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Fix data_read_offset() file opening
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 22:58:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555B95F3.9080003@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519144818.GA29162@danjae.kornet>
On 19/05/2015 5:48 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:05:46PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Patch "perf tools: Protect dso cache fd with a mutex"
>> changed data_file_size() to open the data file if it
>> was not open.
>>
>> data_read_offset() was calling data_file_size() to read
>> the data file size, but data_file_size() can fail to
>> open the file because the binary_type has not been set up.
>>
>> The correct function to call is dso__data_size() which
>> uses dso__data_fd() to open the file correctly.
>
> Right, but I worried about the locking overhead. By using
> dso__data_size() it'll call dso__data_fd() everytime which grabs the
> dso__data_open_lock that is a global mutex. It can be a performance
> bottleneck on multi-thread report IMHO.
>
> I assumed that correct code should check the data fd or size before
> calling read function as I read the comment in dso.h file.
>
> What about adding the missing check in a proper place instead?
It looks to me like you need to change data_file_size() and
dso_cache__read() so that they open the fd properly i.e. call
dso__data_fd() instead of open_dso().
dso__data_fd() should not be taking a lock because the lock must
be held while the fd in being used.
Perhaps there should be dso__get_fd() and dso__put_fd() that lock/open
and the unlock.
But I will have to leave this to you because I am snowed with
my own problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/dso.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
>> index 1b96c8d..e248f56 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
>> @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ off_t dso__data_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine)
>> static ssize_t data_read_offset(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
>> u64 offset, u8 *data, ssize_t size)
>> {
>> - if (data_file_size(dso, machine))
>> + if (dso__data_size(dso, machine) < 0)
>> return -1;
>>
>> /* Check the offset sanity. */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 13:05 [PATCH 0/5] perf tools: Some fixes Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix function declarations needed by parse-events.y Adrian Hunter
2015-05-27 16:45 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf build: Fix libunwind feature detection on 32-bit x86 Adrian Hunter
2015-05-27 16:46 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf tools: Fix parse_events_error dereferences Adrian Hunter
2015-05-27 16:46 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf session: Fix perf_session__peek_event() Adrian Hunter
2015-05-27 16:46 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Fix data_read_offset() file opening Adrian Hunter
2015-05-19 14:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-05-19 19:58 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-05-20 0:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-05-20 0:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-05-19 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf tools: Some fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555B95F3.9080003@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox