From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Subject: [BUG] iscsi-target: deadlock because of iscsit_get_tpg()
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:25:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555B9C3A.40106@ispras.ru> (raw)
Hello,
Our tool reports a potential double lock because of quite strange code
in iscsit_get_tpg().
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c:
int iscsit_get_tpg(
struct iscsi_portal_group *tpg)
{
int ret;
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&tpg->tpg_access_lock);
return ((ret != 0) || signal_pending(current)) ? -1 : 0;
}
If mutex_lock_interruptible() successfully acquires the mutex, but there
is a pending signal, the function returns error, but it leaves the mutex
held. Callers do not expect such behaviour that can lead to a deadlock.
Why the check for pending signal is needed here?
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Similar dangerous pattern presents in a couple of other places:
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c:
int iscsit_access_np(struct iscsi_np *np, struct iscsi_portal_group *tpg)
{
...
ret = down_interruptible(&tpg->np_login_sem);
if ((ret != 0) || signal_pending(current))
return -1;
drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c:
static sense_reason_t
sbc_compare_and_write(struct se_cmd *cmd)
{
...
rc = down_interruptible(&dev->caw_sem);
if ((rc != 0) || signal_pending(current)) {
cmd->transport_complete_callback = NULL;
return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
}
--
Alexey Khoroshilov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 20:25 Alexey Khoroshilov [this message]
2015-05-19 22:10 ` [BUG] iscsi-target: deadlock because of iscsit_get_tpg() Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555B9C3A.40106@ispras.ru \
--to=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox