From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754124AbbETUcZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 16:32:25 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:39498 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753812AbbETUcV (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 16:32:21 -0400 Message-ID: <555CEF45.4090609@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:32:05 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski , "H.J. Lu" CC: Jan Beulich , Binutils , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: RFC: Add -mshared option to x86 ELF assembler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2015 01:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> I got >> >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 kernel.org]$ readelf -r old/vmlinux.o | head -5 >> >> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0xafea2f0 contains 205717 entries: >> Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend >> 000000000001 1253100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000001e70 __fentry__ - 4 >> 000000000009 1c8c00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .data + 51bc >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 kernel.org]$ readelf -r new/vmlinux.o | head -5 >> >> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0xafea280 contains 205711 entries: >> Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend >> 000000000001 1253100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000001e70 __fentry__ - 4 >> 000000000009 1c8c00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .data + 51bc >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 kernel.org]$ >> >> It removes 6 relocations. On gcc master branch, >> >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc-misc]$ size build-x86_64-linux*/gcc/cc1 >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 21529621 62256 1348312 22940189 15e0a1d build-x86_64-linux.branch/gcc/cc1 >> 21529749 62256 1348312 22940317 15e0a9d build-x86_64-linux/gcc/cc1 >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc-misc]$ size build-x86_64-linux*/gcc/cc1plus >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 23713509 62400 1372760 25148669 17fbcfd build-x86_64-linux.branch/gcc/cc1plus >> 23713669 62400 1372760 25148829 17fbd9d build-x86_64-linux/gcc/cc1plus >> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc-misc]$ >> >> It is more effective. I will run more tests. > > This seems like a sensible idea, but I can imagine it breaking some > weird use cases (like that one Linux thing). Is that okay? > What about the patch I posted recently? -hpa