From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: sysfs: don't pass count == 0 to bin file readers
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 02:04:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555E647F.7070907@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150521221423.GK4914@htj.duckdns.org>
Hello Tejun,
On 22.05.2015 01:14, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:21:16AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> If count == 0 bytes are requested by a reader, sysfs_kf_bin_read()
>> deliberately returns 0 without passing a potentially harmful value to
>> some externally defined underlying battr->read() function.
>>
>> However in case of (pos == size && count) the next clause always sets
>> count to 0 and this value is handed over to battr->read().
>>
>> The change intends to make obsolete (and remove later) a redundant
>> sanity check in battr->read(), if it is present, or add more
>> protection to struct bin_attribute users, who does not care about
>> input arguments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
>> ---
>> fs/sysfs/file.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
>> index 7c2867b..6c95628 100644
>> --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
>> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_kf_bin_read(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>> return 0;
>>
>> if (size) {
>> - if (pos > size)
>> + if (pos >= size)
>> return 0;
>> if (pos + count > size)
>> count = size - pos;
>
> Hmmm... maybe just move that test upwards?
>
> if (!count || pos >= size)
> return 0;
>
> count = min(count, size - pos);
>
If the code block stays within if (size && count) { ... }, then !count
check is redundant (you may notice that !count check is already present
above but not shown in diff's 3 lines context), and I agree that
if (pos >= size)
return 0;
if (pos + count > size)
count = size - pos;
and
if (pos >= size)
return 0;
count = min(count, size - pos);
are equal.
But "!size" is a special case,
if (!count || pos >= size)
return 0;
seems to be incorrect in case of !size ===> (pos >= size) == true.
To the sent change I may add a replacement of "if (pos + count > size)
..." with min_t (ssize_t, count, size - pos), if you wish.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 21:21 [PATCH] fs: sysfs: don't pass count == 0 to bin file readers Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-05-21 22:14 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-21 23:04 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2015-05-21 23:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-22 0:46 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-05-25 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555E647F.7070907@mleia.com \
--to=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox