From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:12:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5561804.yNijhH7yqI@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315165900.63f32371.john@metanate.com>
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017, 16:59:00 CET schrieb John Keeping:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:41:21 +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017, 17:28:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> > > Am Montag, 13. März 2017, 18:38:11 CET schrieb John Keeping:
> > > > This lock is used from rockchip_irq_set_type() which is part of the
> > > > irq_chip implementation and thus must use raw_spinlock_t as documented
> > > > in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
> > >
> > > Looks good
> > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> >
> > I have to take that back.
> > This leaves the spin_lock in the schmitt trigger unconverted and produces
> > compile issues.
> >
> > So it either needs to be converted or removed - I guess it should be
> > removed.
> Yes, it looks like it should be removed - the patches adding that hadn't
> been applied when I sent this out!
>
> I'll rebase and add the schmitt trigger change to patch 1 in a day or
> two, after giving a bit more time for reviews.
I don't think you need to wait overly long. Linus seems happy, I'm happy and
the schmitt issue in the open might prevent people from taking a closer look.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-13 18:38 [RFC PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes John Keeping
2017-03-13 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: rockchip: remove unnecessary locking John Keeping
2017-03-15 16:25 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-13 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock John Keeping
2017-03-15 16:28 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-15 16:41 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-15 16:50 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-15 16:59 ` John Keeping
2017-03-15 17:12 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2017-03-13 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: rockchip: split out verification of mux settings John Keeping
2017-03-15 16:34 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-13 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip John Keeping
2017-03-15 17:04 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-15 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: rockchip: PREEMPT_RT_FULL fixes Linus Walleij
2017-03-15 18:17 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 17:09 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5561804.yNijhH7yqI@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox