From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: <hs@denx.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:15:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55641D89.5020103@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWHP6i15Z2qZJBEW9uz7kh1_ET5N1VbOKoMw1EC7F3O0g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2832 bytes --]
On 26/05/15 10:08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 26/05/15 06:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>> Without locking, the initmem may be freed while fb_find_logo() is
>>>> running.
>
> Or afterwards. Drivers may keep the pointer around indefinitely.
>
>>> Yes, you are right, that must be added ... but has such a change a
>>> chance to go in mainline?
>>
>> I don't know. To be honest, this whole thing feels a bit like hackery. I
>> think initdata should only be accessed from initcalls, never asynchronously.
>>
>>> BTW: Could this not be currently a problem on multicore systems?
>>> If lets say core 2 just draws the logo, another core 1 calls
>>> fb_logo_late_init() and later core 1 free_initmem(), while the core 2
>>> still draws it?
>>
>> Yes, I think so...
>
> I don't think that can happen. All initcalls should complete before initmem
> is freed.
Ah, true, the question was only about the initcalls. I was answering to
what actually can happen with the logo code as a whole.
The whole problem started when I fixed an issue where the logos were
accessed from a workqueue. I don't remember the details, but I think drm
always (?) sets up some console stuff via workthread. In that case we
could have the workthread accessing the logos, while initmem is being freed.
>> So, maybe it would be better to not even try to go forward with the
>> current approach. Two approaches come to my mind:
>>
>> 1) Keep the logos in the memory, and don't even try to free them. I
>> don't know many bytes they are in total, though.
>
> m68k/allmodconfig:
>
> $ size drivers/video/logo/logo*o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 24 6961 0 6985 1b49 drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.o
> 24 800 0 824 338 drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_mono.o
> 24 3200 0 3224 c98 drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.o
> 24 6955 0 6979 1b43 drivers/video/logo/logo_mac_clut224.o
> 161 4 2 167 a7 drivers/video/logo/logo.o
>
> Not that bad... Custom logos may be larger, though.
I wonder how much a simple RLE would cut down the sizes...
>> 2) Make a copy of the logos to a kmalloced area at some early boot
>> stage. Then manually free the logos at some point (after the first
>> access to the logos? after a certain time (urgh...)?).
>
> 3) Draw the logos from an initcall on all frame buffers that exist at that
> point in time. Yes, this will destroy (part of) the content that's
> currently shown.
Isn't that almost the same as now? The problem is that the fb probes are
deferred to a very late stage, so we would not have the fbs when the
suggested initcall would be called.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 7:09 [RFC PATCH] video/logo: introduce new system state for checking if logos are freed Heiko Schocher
2015-05-25 5:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 3:56 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 6:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-05-26 7:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-05-26 7:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:29 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:17 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-26 7:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-05-26 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55641D89.5020103@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox