From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753902AbbEZNOe (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 09:14:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49689 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752573AbbEZNO1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 09:14:27 -0400 Message-ID: <556471AF.5090002@arm.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:14:23 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Boyd CC: Sudeep Holla , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" , Mike Turquette , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) References: <1430134846-24320-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1430134846-24320-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20150520234311.GA31753@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <20150520234311.GA31753@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On 21/05/15 00:43, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/27, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig >> index 9897f353bf1a..906bf7dd72a2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig >> @@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ config COMMON_CLK_RK808 >> clocked at 32KHz each. Clkout1 is always on, Clkout2 can off >> by control register. >> >> +config COMMON_CLK_SCPI >> + tristate "Clock driver controlled via SCPI interface" >> + depends on ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL > > || COMPILE_TEST ? > [...] > >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) { >> + struct scpi_clk *sclk; > [...] >> +static int scpi_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + of_clk_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node); >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); > > We don't need to set platform_drvdata to NULL here. > Thanks for the review. I have posted v2 of this series and some of the comments are not applicable(already done or code removed). I have fixed all the remaining comments locally for v3. Regards, Sudeep