From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752AbbE0Ncn (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 09:32:43 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:27590 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374AbbE0Ncl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 09:32:41 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-a8-5565c7763bdf Message-id: <5565C768.6030906@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:32:24 +0200 From: Beata Michalska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Greg KH Cc: Jan Kara , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, hughd@google.com, lczerner@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, kmpark@infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/4] fs: Add generic file system event notifications References: <20150428135653.GD9955@quack.suse.cz> <20150428140936.GA13406@kroah.com> <553F9D56.6030301@samsung.com> <20150428173900.GA16708@kroah.com> <5540822C.10000@samsung.com> <20150429074259.GA31089@quack.suse.cz> <20150429091303.GA4090@kroah.com> <5548B4BB.7050503@samsung.com> <554B5329.8040907@samsung.com> <5564A1D4.4040309@samsung.com> <20150527023412.GA20070@kroah.com> In-reply-to: <20150527023412.GA20070@kroah.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7plx1NDDT4e17L4+qWDxeLcghmM FqcnLGKyePqpj8Vi9vRmJotbl1exWJxtesNusezBZhaLzd872CxmzrvDZrFn70kWi8u75rBZ 3Fvzn9WitecnuwOfR8vmco8Fm0o9Nq/Q8nj7MMBj06dJ7B5NZ44ye7zfd5XNo2/LKkaPMwuO sHt83iQXwBXFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlTF72juWgp2sFTcOPmdqYJzG0sXIySEhYCKxZPFVKFtM 4sK99WxdjFwcQgJLGSWmr33CBOE8Y5R4vHAjM0gVr4CWxMqp91lBbBYBVYlLG06A2WwC+hKv ZqxkArFFBSIk/pzexwpRLyjxY/I9sA0iAjISHUv2sIMMZRbYzyTxeucsRpCEsICnxNkPP6BW tzFLXOm4B9bNCTR16pGJYN3MAjoS+1unsUHY8hKb17xlnsAoMAvJkllIymYhKVvAyLyKUTS1 NLmgOCk911CvODG3uDQvXS85P3cTIyS2vuxgXHzM6hCjAAejEg/vAenUUCHWxLLiytxDjBIc zEoivFP3AoV4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInzzt31PkRIID2xJDU7NbUgtQgmy8TBKdXA 6H+Z94ny7oWSm2s6vhrYyW3azdVrz8jfqh12tcWF/y/rTe5lsqzaS+wYW/dmd/LXlB3Tiek4 zjb96z1Xn/Bapl0LGZ3t7n8w+LHqzpuuBTXJlurL+X782dVZoftuR16i832eI1EMVW8C99Ws D5m9sWnG2zMnapj/8nUrC6l8jdqamdNtEPhaiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAO8Q+FakCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/27/2015 04:34 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 06:39:48PM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Things has gone a bit quiet thread wise ... >> As I believe I've managed to snap back to reality, I was hoping we could continue with this? >> I'm not sure if we've got everything cleared up or ... have we reached a dead end? >> Please let me know if we can move to the next stage? Or, if there are any showstoppers? > > Please resend if you think it's ready and you have addressed the issues > raised so far. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Alright. I'm still running some tests so I'll resend it most probably tomorrow or on Friday. Best Regards Beata