public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@gmail.com>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	"David Lanzendörfer" <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Also set SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:04:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5566CC0C.1050103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrvB1AZGdvQ1fb6ShC8v-3DbVabiki13L8gG7M2saJALA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 28-05-15 10:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 25 May 2015 at 09:02, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24-05-15 20:04, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>>
>>> The function sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff filters out the SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON flag
>>> but never sets it.
>>>
>>> Set SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON when oclk is disabled.
>>
>>
>> Nack, looking at the datasheet I do not thing this patch actually
>> does anything, according to the datasheet setting this bit to 1 results
>> in: "Turn off card clock when FSM in IDLE state", iow this does mmc clock
>> gating on idle automatically in hardware, since we completely disable the
>> clock on clock-off by clearing SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON setting this bit on
>> clock-off is a nop.
>>
>> We could consider actually setting this to safe power when setting the clock
>> on, for doing that it would be good to look at the android code and see if
>> it ever sets this bit and if so when.
>>
>> WRT CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE we are probably better off using SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON
>> then that when it is enabled. So maybe we should set SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON
>> based on #ifdef WRT CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE, and have some way to tell the
>> mmc core to not do clock gating on this host ?
>
> I am planning to remove the entire thing for CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE, maybe
> it's time to do that now!?

Removing it now sounds like a good plan to me, we would still need
to look into maybe enabling SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON on sunxi in some cases
to save power, but that is an orthogonal problem.

Regards,

Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1432491958.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <29e003a6fb8253b1e103f341405d4e8322e3edc2.1432491958.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-05-25  7:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Also set SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON Hans de Goede
2015-05-28  8:02     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-05-28  8:04       ` Hans de Goede [this message]
     [not found] ` <4011290915a42fce8b9c19d59f3ca9c3289a6817.1432491958.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
2015-05-25  1:44   ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff Julian Calaby
2015-05-25  6:58   ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-25 21:02   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5566CC0C.1050103@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch \
    --cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox