Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destination

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On 05/28/2015 07:07 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * riel@redhat.com <riel@redhat.com> [2015-05-27 15:04:28]:
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index c47bf0dffb34..f655f2ad155d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,30 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Only move tasks to a NUMA node less busy than the current node. */
>> +static bool numa_has_capacity(struct task_numa_env *env)
>> +{
>> +	struct numa_stats *src = &env->src_stats;
>> +	struct numa_stats *dst = &env->dst_stats;
>> +
>> +	if (src->has_free_capacity && !dst->has_free_capacity)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Only consider a task move if the source has a higher destination
>> +	 * than the destination, corrected for CPU capacity on each node.
> 
> In the above comment, did you mean source has higher load than the
> destination?

Uh yes, indeed. Thanks for spotting that.

Peter, do you want me to send a v2 with the typo fixed, or
is it easier for you to fix up the typo before committing?

-- 
All rights reversed