From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756025AbbE2OBs (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 10:01:48 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60436 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751854AbbE2OBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 10:01:41 -0400 Message-ID: <55687142.9000701@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:01:38 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIExpxaFrYQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix -i option, which is currently ignored. References: <55685654.2010209@suse.cz> <20150529124241.GL24859@kernel.org> <20150529124353.GM24859@kernel.org> <55685FEB.9090706@suse.cz> <20150529130806.GO24859@kernel.org> <55686504.70402@suse.cz> <20150529135933.GU24859@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20150529135933.GU24859@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/29/2015 03:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:09:24PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu: >>> I failed to find the problem, ouch, the patches looks the same, applying >>> by hand... > >> That's really strange ;) >> Anyway, thanks for application. > > I ended up wasting^Winvesting some more time on that, it seems it was > all thansk to Thunderbird ;-\ > > - Arnaldo > Ok, thank you. I'm going to double check my preferences. Are there any recommended settings in case of sending kernel patches? Thanks, Martin