From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix null dereference if kzalloc returns null
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 23:41:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556B8E0D.8020703@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556B87FC.5080908@cogentembedded.com>
On 31/05/15 23:15, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/01/2015 01:00 AM, Colin King wrote:
>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
>> If kzalloc returns null then isp1760_ep_alloc_request performs
>> a null pointer deference on req.
>
> Dereference, not "deference".
Shall I send v2 for this stupid typo then?
> No, it doesn't. It calculates the address of the
> 'isp1760_request::req' instead, there's no dereference per se. I suppose
> this is a first member of the structure, so this function should work
> correctly in any case.
Well, for now it's the first member, but can we assume that will apply
forever? As it stands, other *_alloc_request() functions in all the
other usb drivers check for the NULL, so this fix just aligns the code
with all of these other drivers.
>
>> Check for null to avoid this.
>
>> Detected with smatch static analysis:
>>
>> drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c:816 isp1760_ep_alloc_request()
>> error: potential null dereference 'req'. (kzalloc returns null)
>
> Well, the change won't hurt anyway, makes things clearer.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-31 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-31 22:00 [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix null dereference if kzalloc returns null Colin King
2015-05-31 22:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-05-31 22:41 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2015-06-01 11:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556B8E0D.8020703@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox