From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] KVM: MTRR: sort variable MTRRs
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:27:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556C2596.1010301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432983566-15773-11-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
On 30/05/2015 12:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Sort all valid variable MTRRs based on its base address, it will help us to
> check a range to see if it's fully contained in variable MTRRs
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f3fc152..5be8f2e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ enum {
> struct kvm_mtrr_range {
> u64 base;
> u64 mask;
> + struct list_head node;
> };
>
> struct kvm_mtrr {
> @@ -362,6 +363,8 @@ struct kvm_mtrr {
> unsigned mtrr_enabled:1;
> };
> };
> +
> + struct list_head head;
> };
>
> struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
> index aeb9767..8e3b81a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,38 @@ do_zap:
> kvm_zap_gfn_range(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(start), gpa_to_gfn(end));
> }
>
> +static bool var_mtrr_range_is_valid(struct kvm_mtrr_range *range)
> +{
> + u64 start, end;
> +
> + if (!(range->mask & (1 << 11)))
> + return false;
> +
> + var_mtrr_range(range, &start, &end);
> + return end > start;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_var_mtrr_start(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state, int index)
> +{
> + /* remove the entry if it's in the list. */
> + if (var_mtrr_range_is_valid(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index]))
> + list_del(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index].node);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_var_mtrr_end(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state, int index)
> +{
> + struct kvm_mtrr_range *tmp, *cur = &mtrr_state->var_ranges[index];
> +
> + /* add it to the list if it's valid. */
> + if (var_mtrr_range_is_valid(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index])) {
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &mtrr_state->head, node)
> + if (cur->base < tmp->base)
> + list_add_tail(&cur->node, &tmp->node);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&cur->node, &mtrr_state->head);
> + }
> +}
> +
> int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
> {
> int index;
> @@ -281,10 +313,12 @@ int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
>
> index = (msr - 0x200) / 2;
> is_mtrr_mask = msr - 0x200 - 2 * index;
> + set_var_mtrr_start(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state, index);
> if (!is_mtrr_mask)
> vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.var_ranges[index].base = data;
> else
> vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.var_ranges[index].mask = data;
> + set_var_mtrr_end(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state, index);
Just move the whole code to a new kvm_set_var_mtrr function.
> }
>
> update_mtrr(vcpu, msr);
> @@ -331,6 +365,11 @@ int kvm_mtrr_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.head);
> +}
> +
> u8 kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state = &vcpu->arch.mtrr_state;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 64c2891..8084ac3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6991,7 +6991,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_vcpu_reset(vcpu, false);
> kvm_mmu_setup(vcpu);
> vcpu_put(vcpu);
> -
> + kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
Please move this call much earlier.
Paolo
> return r;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 956558d..a3dae49 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ int kvm_write_guest_virt_system(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> gva_t addr, void *val, unsigned int bytes,
> struct x86_exception *exception);
>
> +void kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_mtrr_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data);
> int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data);
> int kvm_mtrr_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-30 10:59 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86: fully implement vMTRR Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: x86: move MTRR related code to a separate file Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: MTRR: handle MSR_MTRRcap in kvm_mtrr_get_msr Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: MTRR: remove mtrr_state.have_fixed Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: MTRR: exactly define the size of variable MTRRs Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: MTRR: clean up mtrr default type Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 1:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-09 0:35 ` David Matlack
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: MTRR: do not split 64 bits MSR content Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: MTRR: improve kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 2:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-03 7:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce fixed_mtrr_segment table Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 2:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce var_mtrr_range Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-09 0:36 ` David Matlack
2015-06-09 2:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: MTRR: sort variable MTRRs Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:27 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-06-03 2:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce fixed_mtrr_addr_* functions Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce mtrr_for_each_mem_type Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-01 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 2:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-03 2:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-09 0:36 ` David Matlack
2015-06-09 2:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: MTRR: simplify kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: MTRR: do not map huage page for non-consistent range Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-01 9:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-01 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 2:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-03 7:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-04 8:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-04 8:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 6:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-30 10:59 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: VMX: fully implement guest MTRR virtualization Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556C2596.1010301@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).