public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ganguly.s@samsung.com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI <suneel@samsung.com>,
	"vikram.m@samsung.com" <vikram.m@samsung.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Waiman.Long@hp.com" <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
	"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@samsung.com>,
	"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:41:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556D492C.1050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357570181.391771433224164775.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas06d>

On 06/02/2015 11:19 AM, Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
> I made the CONFIG_ARCH_MULTI_V6=y and
> CONFIG_CPU_V6K=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6K=y
>
> and compiled 4.0.4 with the patch. Result is a compilation success.
>
> Regards,
> Sarbojit
>

Hi Sarbojit,

I am not familiar about the implication of setting those options
unconditionally, But from Kconfig point of view
Arnd was expecting something like below IIUC
with the patch: (a quick example)

---8<---
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 9f1f09a..194fc13 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ config ARCH_MULTI_V6
         bool "ARMv6 based platforms (ARM11)"
         select ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7
         select CPU_V6K
+       select CPU_32v6
+       select CPU_32v6k

  config ARCH_MULTI_V7
         bool "ARMv7 based platforms (Cortex-A, PJ4, Scorpion, Krait)"



> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
> Date : May 19, 2015 18:51 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange
>
> On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:39:33 Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
>> Since 16 bit half word exchange was not there and MCS based qspinlock by Waiman's xchg_tail() requires an atomic exchange on a half word,
>> here is a small modification to __xchg() code.
>
> We have discussed a similar patch before, see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/25/390
>
>>   #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
>> @@ -50,6 +52,23 @@
>>                          : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>>                          : "memory", "cc");
>>                  break;
>> +               /*
>> +                * halfword exclusive exchange
>> +                * This is new implementation as qspinlock
>> +                * wants 16 bit atomic CAS.
>> +                */
>> +       case 2:
>> +               asm volatile("@ __xchg2\n"
>> +               "1:     ldrexh  %0, [%3]\n"
>> +               "       strexh  %1, %2, [%3]\n"
>> +               "       teq     %1, #0\n"
>> +               "       bne     1b"
>> +                       : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
>> +                       : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>> +                       : "memory", "cc");
>> +               break;
>>          case 4:
>>                  asm volatile("@ __xchg4\n"
>>                  "1:     ldrex   %0, [%3]\n"
>
> Please try to find a way to make this compile when CONFIG_CPU_V6
> is set.
>
> Arnd
>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-02  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-02  5:49 Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-06-02  6:11 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-05  1:17 Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-06-05 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-06-02  6:21 Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-06-02 10:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-20  5:09 Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-05-20  6:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 11:20 Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-05-19 11:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-19  9:39 Sarbojit Ganguly
2015-05-19  9:51 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556D492C.1050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ganguly.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sharan.allur@samsung.com \
    --cc=suneel@samsung.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vikram.m@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox