Re: [PATCH] Documentation, intel_pstate: Add a better description of the intel_pstate legacy mode internal governors

[Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>]

On 06/02/2015 12:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 01-06-15, 09:36, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> This patchset was originally submitted and acked here
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140203008832333&w=2
>>
>> but lost at some point.
>>
>> P.
>>
>> ----8<----
> 
> I don't think this is the right place to have this information, you
> should have added it after the three dashes below. (---).

AFAIK "scissors" works for comments not to be included in the commit.

> 
>> The current documentation is incomplete wrt the intel_pstate legacy
>> internal governors.  The confusion comes from the general cpufreq
>> governors which also use the names performance and powersave.  This patch
>> better differentiates between the two sets of governors and gives an
>> explanation of how the internal P-state governors behave differently from
>> one another.
>>
>> Also fix two minor typos.
>>
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
>> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
>> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> 
> You could have carried my Ack :)

:)  I was uncomfortable carrying it TBH because I had changed the patch.

P.

> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>