From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<will.deacon@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ralf@linux-mips.org>, <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>,
<macro@linux-mips.org>, <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>,
<alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: R6: Use lightweight SYNC instruction in smp_* memory barriers
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:20:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556DF408.2040003@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150602121227.GA1474@macpro.local>
On 06/02/2015 05:12 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Paul Burton wrote:
>
>> I think this would read better as something like:
>>
>> If a processor does not implement the lightweight sync operations then
>> the architecture requires that they interpret the corresponding sync
>> instructions as the typical heavyweight "sync 0". Therefore this
>> should be safe to enable on all CPUs implementing release 2 or
>> later of the MIPS architecture.
>>
> Is it really the case for release 2?
>
> I'm asking because recently I needed to do something similar and I couldn't
> find this garantee in the revision 2.00 of the manual.
Yes. MD00086/MD00084/MD00087 Rev 2.60 are technically MIPS R2. And this
revision explicitly lists optional codes and it has a clear statement:
> Implementations that do not use any of the non-zero values of stype to
> define different barriers, such as ordering bar-
> riers, must make those stype values act the same as stype zero.
(don't blame me that Rev 2.60 is 5 years after initial 2.00, it is still
MIPS R2).
- Leonid.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-02 0:09 [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: SMP memory barriers: lightweight sync, acquire-release Leonid Yegoshin
2015-06-02 0:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: R6: Use lightweight SYNC instruction in smp_* memory barriers Leonid Yegoshin
2015-06-02 10:08 ` Paul Burton
2015-06-02 12:12 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-06-02 12:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-06-02 18:20 ` Leonid Yegoshin [this message]
2015-06-02 10:48 ` James Hogan
2015-06-02 16:15 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-06-02 23:56 ` David Daney
2015-06-03 1:56 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-06-05 13:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-06-05 21:18 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-01-28 2:28 ` Joshua Kinard
2016-01-29 13:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-01-30 16:25 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-06-02 0:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: enforce LL-SC loop enclosing with SYNC (ACQUIRE and RELEASE) Leonid Yegoshin
2015-06-02 11:39 ` James Hogan
2015-06-02 0:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: bugfix - replace smp_mb with release barrier function in unlocks Leonid Yegoshin
2015-06-02 11:42 ` James Hogan
2015-06-02 13:22 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-06-02 8:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: SMP memory barriers: lightweight sync, acquire-release Joshua Kinard
2015-06-02 9:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-06-02 18:59 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-06-02 19:19 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556DF408.2040003@imgtec.com \
--to=leonid.yegoshin@imgtec.com \
--cc=Steven.Hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).