From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hangs in verify_pmtmr_rate()
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:11:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556F6D8C.3040204@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLUzyh8SUaRZ-WtqY5WHY5PLubU1gr_3-GB06MR0pEr15g@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/03/2015 01:46 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
>> I'm seeing boot hangs when trying to boot a 32-bit 4.1.0-rc5 kernel on
>> some 64-bit CPUs (I'm not sure if it is a regression). The NMI watchdog
>> shows init_acpi_pm_clocksource() as the last thing in the backtrace,
>> specifically verify_pmtmr_rate()'s I/O instructions. It appears to be
>> mach_countup()'s while loop that gets stuck.
>>
>> Booting with "pmtmr=0" works around this for me, as would unsetting
>> CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER I'd imagine.
>>
>> The hardware I'm doing this on is a bit wonky and I think the hpet is
>> broken on it.
>>
>> Does this look like *really* broken hardware, or something that we
>> should be detecting and able to recover from?
>
> Hrm. Does this machine have a working PIT?
It _should_. :)
> Does pit_calibrate_tsc() end up being used on this box to calibrate
> the TSC (its similar logic, so it should get stuck in the same way),
> or does it use a different method for tsc calibration?
I end up seeing:
> tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed
> tsc: Using PIT calibration value
> tsc: Detected 911.616 MHz processor
> Calibrating delay loop (skipped) , value calculated using timer frequency.. 1823.23 BogoMIPS... (lpj=3646464)
Which makes it look like native_calibrate_tsc() managed to successfully
do a pit_calibrate_tsc() and got to the code below (otherwise we would
have hit the (tsc_pit_min == ULONG_MAX) case).
> /* We don't have an alternative source, use the PIT calibration value */
> if (!hpet && !ref1 && !ref2) {
> pr_info("Using PIT calibration value\n");
> return tsc_pit_min;
> }
I later see:
> timekeeping watchdog: Marking clocksource 'tsc' as unstable, because skew is too large:
> 'refined-jiffies' wd_now: ffeef86 wd_last: fffeef09 mask: ffffffff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-03 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 19:55 hangs in verify_pmtmr_rate() Dave Hansen
2015-06-03 20:46 ` John Stultz
2015-06-03 21:11 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-06-03 21:48 ` Yu, Fenghua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556F6D8C.3040204@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox