From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753572AbbFDMbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:31:15 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:56176 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753240AbbFDMbK (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:31:10 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,552,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="720688279" Message-ID: <55704509.7000409@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:31:05 +0800 From: "Lu, Baolu" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Heikki Krogerus CC: David Cohen , Greg Kroah-Hartman , balbi@ti.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in subsys_initcall References: <1432691137-2635-1-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20150527023702.GA7038@kroah.com> <20150527165327.GB1028@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com> <55666644.1060305@linux.intel.com> <20150604121700.GA6283@kuha.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20150604121700.GA6283@kuha.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/04/2015 08:17 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi Baolu, > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:50:12AM +0800, Lu, Baolu wrote: >> On 05/28/2015 12:53 AM, David Cohen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:37:02PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:45:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>>>> Phy drivers and the ulpi interface providers depend on the >>>>> registration of the ulpi bus. Ulpi registers the bus in >>>>> module_init(). This could cause unnecessary probe delays. >>>> What do you mean by "probe delays"? >>> I believe he meant the bus users' probe delays. i.e. unnecessary >>> -EPROBE_DEFER happening on ulpi_drivers in case they're registered >>> before ulpi bus itself. >>> >>> Is that correct, Baolu? >> Yes. > Could you prepare one more version of this patche with the change log > included. Sure. I will resent it soon. > > > Thanks, >