From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] stop_machine: Fix deadlock between multiple stop_two_cpus()
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:08:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571D77E.3080203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150605153023.GH19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 06/05/2015 11:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Jiri reported a machine stuck in multi_cpu_stop() with
> migrate_swap_stop() as function and with the following src,dst cpu
> pairs: {11, 4} {13, 11} { 4, 13}
>
> 4 11 13
>
> cpuM: queue(4 ,13)
> *Ma
> cpuN: queue(13,11)
> *N Na
> *M Mb
> cpuO: queue(11, 4)
> *O Oa
> *Nb
> *Ob
>
> Where *X denotes the cpu running the queueing of cpu-X and X[ab] denotes
> the first/second queued work.
>
> You'll observe the top of the workqueue for each cpu: 4,11,13 to be work
> from cpus: M, O, N resp. IOW. deadlock.
>
> Do away with the queueing trickery and introduce lg_double_lock() to
> lock both CPUs and fully serialize the stop_two_cpus() callers instead
> of the partial (and buggy) serialization we have now.
>
> Completely untested..
>
> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Certainly looks like it would work.
I suspect we should probably apply this patch after some basic
testing, since the race is so incredibly hard to reproduce.
--
All rights reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 15:30 [RFC][PATCH] stop_machine: Fix deadlock between multiple stop_two_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-05 17:08 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-06-19 18:00 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/stop_machine: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5571D77E.3080203@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox