From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932608AbbFFWHN (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2015 18:07:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:33450 "EHLO mail-lb0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752537AbbFFWHG (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2015 18:07:06 -0400 Message-ID: <55736F05.8000904@cogentembedded.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 01:07:01 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: Cogent Embedded User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Jarzmik , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts; pxa: add embedded pxa camera capture interface References: <1433624953-28165-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <1433624953-28165-4-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <1433624953-28165-4-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 06/07/2015 12:09 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > The pxa27x SoCs have an embedded camera host controller. Add the > description to the family description. > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi > index 506db86..9ebfd7f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi > @@ -77,6 +77,23 @@ > clocks = <&clks CLK_KEYPAD>; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + pxa_camera: pxa_camera@50000000 { The ePAPR standard has something to say about the node naming: "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model." So I'd suggest "video@50000000" instead... [...] WBR, Sergei