From: Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@perches.com,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: dig_t::dbg_mode
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 21:28:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55749B6D.9090508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150604060651.GE6376@sudip-PC>
On 04.06.2015 08:06, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:50:07AM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
>> On 04.06.2015 07:18, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
>>>> On 03.06.2015 09:26, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, I missed that - this one should also be removed - probably because of similar naming (DbgMode, dbg_mode).
>>>> Thanks for finding it - I'll fix that in v2.
>>>>
>>>> Apart from that - did you had time/courage to analyze rest of the patches (so I can send v2)?
>>>
>>> at a first glance looked ok to me. I hope you have checked it on the
>>> hardware as well. but maybe Dan can find something.
>>> better send v2.
>>
>> Of course I have checked it, although - as I wrote in past - this driver has not very good performance.
> is there any other driver which has better performance on this hardware
> than this driver? and how are you measuring the performance?
What I meant is that this driver (at least on my HW/SW configuration) is not very reliable.
It drops a lot of packages and transmission speed is far from declared.
But - as far as I checked - it's not due to my changes (I checked that some time ago).
Perhaps my hardware has some issues - I have to buy another rtl8192e card and/or test on Windows
to be sure (will do both steps probably).
As for measurement, I have simple tests on my home network (WPA2/CCMP):
- Scan available networks
- Download 1MB file, check md5
- Ping router/gateway
Regards,
Mateusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-07 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-02 20:48 [PATCH 00/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 01/11] " Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 02/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: cmpk_handle_query_config_rx() Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 03/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: cmpk_message_handle_rx() Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 04/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: read/write_cam Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 05/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove unused macros/structures in rtl_core.h Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 06/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: rtl_dm.[ch] Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-04 13:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-06-07 19:34 ` Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 07/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: dig_t::dbg_mode Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-03 7:26 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-03 18:21 ` Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-04 5:18 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-04 5:50 ` Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-04 6:06 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-07 19:28 ` Mateusz Kulikowski [this message]
2015-06-04 13:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 08/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: rt_stats Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 09/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: undefined arrays Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 10/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: r8192_priv members Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-06-02 20:48 ` [PATCH 11/11] staging: rtl8192e: Remove dead code: mp_adapter Mateusz Kulikowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55749B6D.9090508@gmail.com \
--to=mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox