From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V3 14/15] xen: allow more than 512 GB of RAM for 64 bit pv-domains
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:09:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55752386.5010806@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5565F977.102@citrix.com>
On 05/27/2015 07:05 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 27/05/15 17:25, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 20/04/15 06:23, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> 64 bit pv-domains under Xen are limited to 512 GB of RAM today. The
>>> main reason has been the 3 level p2m tree, which was replaced by the
>>> virtual mapped linear p2m list. Parallel to the p2m list which is
>>> being used by the kernel itself there is a 3 level mfn tree for usage
>>> by the Xen tools and eventually for crash dump analysis. For this tree
>>> the linear p2m list can serve as a replacement, too. As the kernel
>>> can't know whether the tools are capable of dealing with the p2m list
>>> instead of the mfn tree, the limit of 512 GB can't be dropped in all
>>> cases.
>>>
>>> This patch replaces the hard limit by a kernel parameter which tells
>>> the kernel to obey the 512 GB limit or not. The default is selected by
>>> a configuration parameter which specifies whether the 512 GB limit
>>> should be active per default for domUs (domain save/restore/migration
>>> and crash dump analysis are affected).
>>>
>>> Memory above the domain limit is returned to the hypervisor instead of
>>> being identity mapped, which was wrong anyway.
>>>
>>> The kernel configuration parameter to specify the maximum size of a
>>> domain can be deleted, as it is not relevant any more.
>>
>> Something in this patch breaks the hvc console in my test domU.
>>
>> kernel BUG at /local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c:153
>>
>> Which suggests the hvc driver mapped the wrong console ring frame.
>
> Sorry, it's patch #13 (xen: move p2m list if conflicting with e820 map)
> that seems to be bad.
I think I've found the reason: the console frame isn't being marked as
"reserved" any more. With moving the p2m list I had to change the call
of memblock_reserve() for it. Before that patch this call covered the
p2m list, the start_info page, the xenstore page and the console page.
I added a memblock_reserve() for start_info, but failed to do so for
xenstore and console.
I'll modify the patch and respin.
I have to check why I didn't hit this issue. Maybe my test machine was
too large and the memory in question didn't get reused until my test
was finished.
Thanks for testing,
Juergen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1429507420-18201-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
2015-05-19 10:11 ` [Xen-devel] [Patch V3 00/15] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB David Vrabel
[not found] ` <1429507420-18201-15-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
2015-05-27 16:25 ` [Xen-devel] [Patch V3 14/15] xen: allow more than 512 GB of RAM for 64 bit pv-domains David Vrabel
2015-05-27 17:05 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-08 5:09 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55752386.5010806@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox