From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinz Diehl <htd+ml@fritha.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NILFS2: double uuid
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 22:04:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5576E44F.5030201@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150609085329.GF1992@ws.net.home>
Hi,
On 2015/06/09 17:53, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:31:27AM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> It looks like the backup super block should be dropped from candidates
>> if its device size (sbp->s_dev_size) doesn't match the partition size.
>
> Yeah, fixed:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=00817742ce360119e079a33e12cf84118ff7c63e
>
> Note that workaround is to not use nilfs2 on the last partition or
> have a tiny gap (1 sector is enough) between last partition and the
> end of the whole-disk.
>
> Karel
>
Thanks for your quick work!
I tested the patch. It almost worked fine.
One issue I found is a transient state after fs-resizing.
After shrinking the file system, both superblocks dropped and
lsblk failed to detect the filesystem:
$ sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib lsblk -f
NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID
MOUNTPOINT
[...]
sdb
`-sdb1 nilfs2 2d7cd130-82a0-4a3c-b8a8-4ac5a26f5703 /test
$ sudo nilfs-resize -y /dev/sdb1 1G
Partition size = 2146435072 bytes.
Shrink the filesystem size from 2146435072 bytes to 1073741824 bytes.
128 segments will be truncated from segnum 127.
Moving 103 in-use segments.
progress |***********************************************|
Done.
$ sudo umount /test
$ sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /test
$ sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib lsblk -f
NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID
MOUNTPOINT
[...]
sdb
`-sdb1 /test
This blank state continued until I shrank the partition or
re-extended the filesystem to the partition size.
Could you consider confining the s_dev_size test only to the
backup superblock ?
It seems that we don't have to drop the primary super block
even if s_dev_size doesn't fit to the partition size.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 6:43 NILFS2: double uuid Heinz Diehl
2015-06-08 6:47 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-08 8:18 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2015-06-08 9:45 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-08 10:08 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-08 10:12 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-08 10:31 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2015-06-08 15:31 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2015-06-08 17:23 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-09 5:45 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-09 8:53 ` Karel Zak
2015-06-09 9:46 ` Heinz Diehl
2015-06-09 13:04 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
2015-06-09 14:07 ` Karel Zak
2015-06-09 16:00 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5576E44F.5030201@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=htd+ml@fritha.org \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox