From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc3: ep0: Fix mem corruption on OUT transfers of more than 512 bytes
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:44:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557710CE.5050304@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1506091114340.1324-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Hi,
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 08:46 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>>> Why not just make the bounce buffer size the same as the maxpacket
>>> size? In other words, 1024 bytes instead of 512, for ep0 on a USB-3
>>> device.
>>
>> It would still be possible for the host to send data more than 1024 bytes no?
>
> Yes.
>
>> When working with DFU gadget, I've seen host sends data upto 4KB. Changing the
>> bounce buffer size might not be able to fix all the cases IMO. The actual fix
>> will be something like [1]
>>
>> [1] -> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1883688
>
> But with a bounce buffer that's only 512 bytes long, you can never send
> an entire packet's worth of data. If the bounce buffer is 1024 bytes
for control endpoint, 512 bytes should be sufficient to send entire packet right?
> then you can send the entire first packet. When that's done, you can
> send the second packet. And so on. It wouldn't be quite as fast, but
> for ep0 that shouldn't matter.
right! this is a variant of what I tried to implement in chained TRB [1].
$subject tries just to avoid memory corruption instead of actually trying to
receive all the data.
Thanks
Kishon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 14:35 [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc3: ep0: Fix mem corruption on OUT transfers of more than 512 bytes Kishon Vijay Abraham I
[not found] ` <CAOf5uwmVRaHbiHaRsiwKjCbxg5BxjyP8WPq9whrtK-UdSsL47w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-09 14:44 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-06-09 14:59 ` Alan Stern
2015-06-09 15:08 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-06-09 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2015-06-09 16:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2015-06-09 17:24 ` Alan Stern
2015-06-10 5:33 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-06-09 17:16 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-06-11 18:57 ` Michael Trimarchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557710CE.5050304@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox