* mmap vs. read/write performance/overhead revisited
@ 2015-06-09 19:02 Wolfgang Draxinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Wolfgang Draxinger @ 2015-06-09 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi!
So how is it _today_ with the current 4.x kernels when it comes to mmap
vs read(2)/write(2)?
Either it's my Google-foo lacking or the most recent comment on the
topic really dates back 15 years, but this is the only substancial
background information relevant for Linux I did find:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=95496636207616&w=2
... that was 15 years ago, the beaver was not even conceived, not to
speak going into detox, or even its predecessor. So I'm wondering, how
relevant are the deliberations of back then today?
I've got a very practical application for which this deliberation is
relevant, but I don't want to spam the list with a technical lecture on
ultra high speed OCT imaging.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-06-09 19:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-09 19:02 mmap vs. read/write performance/overhead revisited Wolfgang Draxinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox