From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
To: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
dianders@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP code style
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:59:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5577D257.4090409@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433843400-24831-4-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>
Hi Caesar,
On 06/09/2015 05:49 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Use the below scripts to check:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --subject arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v6:
> - fix the commnet Unified format.
> Series-changes: 5
> - Add the changelog.
> Series-changes: 2
> - Use the checkpatch.pl -f --subjective to check.
>
> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> index d629206..30ccb82 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
> ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd);
> if (ret < 0) {
> pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
>
> if (cpu >= ncores) {
> pr_err("%s: cpu %d outside maximum number of cpus %d\n",
> - __func__, cpu, ncores);
> + __func__, cpu, ncores);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
> return ret;
>
> if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> - /* We communicate with the bootrom to active the cpus other
> + /*
> + * We communicate with the bootrom to active the cpus other
> * than cpu0, after a blob of initialize code, they will
> * stay at wfe state, once they are actived, they will check
> * the mailbox:
> @@ -149,11 +150,11 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
> * The cpu0 need to wait the other cpus other than cpu0 entering
> * the wfe state.The wait time is affected by many aspects.
> * (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, ...)
> - * */
> + */
> mdelay(1); /* ensure the cpus other than cpu0 to startup */
>
> writel(virt_to_phys(rockchip_secondary_startup),
> - sram_base_addr + 8);
> + sram_base_addr + 8);
> writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
> dsb_sev();
> }
> @@ -336,7 +337,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
> static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
> - while(1)
> + while (1)
> cpu_do_idle();
> }
> #endif
> @@ -349,4 +350,5 @@ static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = {
> .cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die,
> #endif
> };
> +
> CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 9:49 [PATCH v6 0/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP Caesar Wang
2015-06-09 9:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset Caesar Wang
2015-06-09 18:16 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-10 5:58 ` Kever Yang
2015-06-09 9:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ARM: rockchip: ensure CPU to enter WFI/WFE state Caesar Wang
2015-06-09 18:13 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-10 5:59 ` Kever Yang
2015-06-09 9:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP code style Caesar Wang
2015-06-09 18:17 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-10 5:59 ` Kever Yang [this message]
2015-06-09 20:04 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP Heiko Stübner
2015-06-13 21:02 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5577D257.4090409@rock-chips.com \
--to=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox