Re: [PATCH 00/21] On-demand device registration

Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-06-03T19:59:22Z

Hi Tomeu,

On 05/28/2015 07:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>> I have a problem with the panel on my Tegra Chromebook taking longer than
>> expected to be ready during boot (Stéphane Marchesin reported what is
>> basically the same issue in [0]), and have looked into ordered probing as a
>> better way of solving this than moving nodes around in the DT or playing with
>> initcall levels.
>>
>> While reading the thread [1] that Alexander Holler started with his series to
>> make probing order deterministic, it occurred to me that it should be possible
>> to achieve the same by registering devices as they are referenced by other
>> devices.
>
> I like the concept and novel approach.
>
>> This basically reuses the information that is already implicit in the probe()
>> implementations, saving us from refactoring existing drivers or adding
>> information to DTBs.
>>
>> Something I'm not completely happy with is that I have had to move the call to
>> of_platform_populate after all platform drivers have been registered.
>> Otherwise I don't see how I could register drivers on demand as we don't have
>> yet each driver's compatible strings.
>
> Yeah, this is the opposite of what we'd really like. Ideally, we would
> have a solution that works for modules too. However, we're no worse
> off. We pretty much build-in dependencies to avoid module ordering
> problems.
>
> Perhaps we need to make the probing on-demand rather than simply on
> device<->driver match occurring.
>
>> For machs that don't move of_platform_populate() to a later point, these
>> patches shouldn't cause any problems but it's not guaranteed that we'll avoid
>> all the deferred probes as some drivers may not be registered yet.
>
> Ideally, of_platform_populate is not explicitly called by each
> platform. So I think we need to make this work for the default case.
>
>> I have tested this on boards with Tegra, iMX.6 and Exynos SoCs, and these
>> patches were enough to eliminate all the deferred probes.
>>
>> With this series I get the kernel to output to the panel in 0.5s, instead of 2.8s.
>
> That's certainly compelling.

I've found your idea about moving device registration later during System boot
very interesting so I've decided to try it on dra7-evem (TI) :).
It's good to know time during Kernel boot when we can assume that all drivers are
ready for probing, so there are more ways to control probing order.

Pls, Note here that TI OMAP2+ mach is not pure DT mach - it's combination of
DT and not DT devices/drivers.

Ok. So What was done...

LKML Linux 4.1-rc3 (a simple case)
1) use your patches 3/4 as reference (only these two patches :)
2) move of_platform_populate later at device_initcall_sync time
Boot time reduction ~0.4 sec

TI Android Kernel 3.14 (NOT a simple case)
1) use your patches 3/4 as reference (only these two patches :)
2) move of_platform_populate later at device_initcall_sync time
3) make it to boot (not sure I've fixed all issues, but those which
break the System boot):
- split non-DT and DT devices registration in platform code;
- keep non-DT devices registration from .init_machine() [arch_initcall]
- move DT-devices registration at device_initcall_sync time
- fix drivers which use platform_driver_probe().
Note. Now there are at about ~190 occurrences of this macro in Kernel.
- re-order few devices in DT (4 devices)
- fix one driver which uses of_find_device_by_node() wrongly
Note. This API is used some times with assumption that
requested dev has been probed already.
Boot time reduction ~0.3 sec. Probing of some devices are still deferred.

TI Android Kernel 3.14 + of_platform_device_ensure
1) backport of_platform_device_ensure() (also need patches
"of: Introduce device tree node flag helpers" and
"of: Keep track of populated platform devices")
2) back-port all your patches which uses of_platform_device_ensure()
3) make it to boot:
- drop patch dma: of: Probe DMA controllers on demand
- fix deadlock in regulator core:
regulator_dev_lookup() called from regulator_register() in K3.14
4) get rid of deferred probes - add of_platform_device_ensure() calls in:
- drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/output.c
- drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c

Boot time reduction: NONE !?

So few comments from above:
- registering devices later during the System boot may improve boot time.
But resolving of all deferred probes may NOT improve boot time ;)
Have you seen smth like this?

- usage of of_platform_device_ensure() will require continuous fixing of Kernel :(

- late_initcall is not (as for me not safe) a good time to register devices. A lot
of platforms/subsystems/frameworks perform their final initialization or clean-up
steps, with assumption that System mostly ready to work. For example, CPUIdle/CPUFreq
are allowed and other PM staff. CPUIdle and driver's probing are not friends.

What would be nice to have for now in my opinion:
- some useful place to move device population code.
May be machine_desc->init_device_sync() callback.
- some optional feature in DTC which will allow to re-arrange DT nodes for levels 0(root)
and 1(simple-bus) using standard or widely used bindings (gpio, regulators, clocks, dma,
pinctrl, irqs).

Additional note:
- Changing device's registration order will change devices's order in
dpm_list (drivers/base/power/main.c) and devices_kset list
(drivers/base/core.c). This might potentially affect on suspend [1] and shutdown.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/12/324

--
regards,
-grygorii